Translation disclaimer (Translation disclaimer)

This content has been translated by a computer program and may not be 100% accurate.

(This content has been translated by a computer program and may not be 100% accurate.)

Sowerby Bridge Corridor Improvement Programme - Traffic Regulation Orders

A package of improvement measures on the A646/A6033/A58 corridors to improve traffic flows, reduce congestion, reduce accidents and stimulate economic growth.

Proposed scheme

Calderdale Council have proposed a package of improvement measures on the A646/A6033/A58 corridors. This is to improve traffic flows, reduce congestion, reduce accidents and stimulate economic growth.

The measures proposed prioritise pedestrians and support local regeneration proposals.

To facilitate these improvements in the Sowerby Bridge area, a number of changes are required to existing traffic regulation orders.

In summary, the intended collective effect of the above Orders will be as follows:

Rochdale Road, Triangle

Junction protection at its junction with Woodlands, Parkfield Drive and East Street

Pye Nest Road/Rochdale Road

Kerb realignments and the introduction of cycle lanes requires the introduction of no waiting at any time restrictions to prevent parking in the cycle lane. No waiting at any time junction protection around the junctions off Pye Nest Road and Rochdale Road

Oldham Road, Ripponden

Extend existing waiting restrictions and change to no waiting at any time

Oldham Road, Rishworth

Provision of a pelican crossing, changes to kerb alignments and amendments to exiting waiting restrictions and school keep clear markings at Rishworth School.

Luddenden Foot

Provision of a pelican crossing, changes to kerb alignments and amendments to existing waiting restrictions and removal of existing school keep clear markings at Luddenden Foot academy. Junction protection at the Cooperfields/Burnley Road junction

Wharf Street

Kerb realignments to enable widening of footways, with alterations and removal of some on-street parking. Also other amendments to waiting and loading restrictions to facilitate these improvements. The provision of a new signalised crossing

Tuel Lane

Kerb line realignments to enable better traffic flow, supplemented by amendments to waiting and loading restrictions and a relocated zebra crossing

Supporting documents

Full details of the proposals can be found in the supporting documents below.

These documents are also available for inspection at the Halifax Central Library, Halifax, HX1 1QG (please see Central Library location and opening times). Alternatively copies of the documents are available on request via proposedtro@calderdale.gov.uk or phone 01422 288001 or 288002.

Should you have any questions, please contact proposedtro@calderdale.gov.uk or phone 01422 288001 or 288002 (n.b. Library staff will not be able to answer queries).

How to object or comment

Representations or comments to any part of the proposed orders should be sent, in writing, to:

  • Proposed TROs
  • Highways and Transportation
    C/O The Town Hall
    Crossley Street
    Halifax
    HX1 1UJ

Or via Email: CIP@calderdale.gov.uk

Closing date for comments

Any representations or comments must be received in writing by 6th October 2022.

Update

The Pye Nest Road element of the scheme has been withdrawn (Cycle Lane and waiting restrictions).

Some elements of the TRO plus the School Entrance Clearway markings TRO have now been made and are operational on the 5th June 2023. Details can be found below in the supporting documents above.

The remaining elements of the TRO are due to be made in the near future.

Action plan

Action Completion date
Formal Consultation 15th September - 6th October 2022
Order made and operational (Part A) 5th June 2023
Order made and operational (School Entrance Clearway) 5th June 2023

What happens next?

After the consultation period ends, all representations and comments received will be considered by the Case Manager.

A report that contains their recommendations will be presented to the Governing Body for final consideration.

Webpage feedback

Was this page helpful? Rate this page helpful Rate this page unhelpful